Nicholas David Ionel vs Quentin Folliot Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
W W L W L L W W W LHead-2-Head: Ionel 1 - 1 Folliot
They have played 4 sets in total, with Ionel winning 2 and Folliot winning 2. The last match between Ionel and Folliot was at the M15 Bucharest, 26-05-2021, First, Clay with Nicholas David Ionel getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nicholas David Ionel | 1 |
| Quentin Folliot | 1 |
M15 Bucharest(26-05-2021)
7
5
6
0
| Ionel | Stats | Folliot |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (20-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 356 | Ranking | 894 |
| 184 | Highest Rank | 488 |
| 22 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 17 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (310-178) | Career Total W/L | 56% (201-156) |
| $3,475 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Svitolina VS Sakkari PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Quentin Folliot
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 21 | Games Won | 18 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:36:30 | Average Match Time | 1:36:30 |
| 63% (71/112) | 1st Serve % | 61% (76/125) |
| 49% (35/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (47/76) |
| 59% (24/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (16/49) |
| 63% (10/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
| 50% (62/125) | Return Points Win % | 47% (53/112) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nicholas David Ionel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Liam Broady
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Andrey Chepelev
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Tim Handel
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Alex Martinez
88%
(
75 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
82%
(
56 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Florian Broska
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Alessandro Bellifemine
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Quentin Folliot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Mateus Alves
Player
Quentin Folliot
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Jose Pereira
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Enzo Crevelaro
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joaquim Almeida
Player
Quentin Folliot
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Quentin Folliot
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
6
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Gabriel Tumasonis
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Quentin Folliot
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
49
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Alessandro Pecci
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
0
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Kenny de Schepper
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (310/178) | Win/Loss | 56% (201/156) |
| 61% (674/440) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (443/350) |
| 54% (5515/4692) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3714/3363) |
| 64% (54/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (57/43) |
| 65% (255/140) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (139/99) |
| 14% (1/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 26% (5/14) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 574 | Aces Total | 355 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1003 | Total Double Faults | 462 |
| 1:42:44 | Average Match Time | 1:8:23 |
| 470.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.55 |
| 68% (20574/30480) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10228/16456) |
| 63% (13030/20574) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6387/10228) |
| 50% (4925/9906) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2981/6227) |
| 48% (1781/3694) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (913/1948) |
| 44% (13745/31052) | Return Points Win % | 44% (7076/16234) |
| 0% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (52/61) | Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) |
| 71% (255/104) | Futures W/L | 57% (198/149) |
| 63% (306/483) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (195/347) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 54% (61/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (27/58) |
| 59% (85/143) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (39/82) |
| 89% (305/271) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (206/183) |
| 11% (305/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (206/23) |
| 21% (181/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (151/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
